the weight of all things

Posts tagged politics

rickkanelives:

schasem:

Rand Paul says that if you believe in universal health care, you believe in slavery. Yes. Slavery.

He’s a complete nut. Thanks for posting this.

what the actual fuck.

the girl’s expression in the background is priceless.

(via universalresistance)

"Considering the fact that so many kids could realistically answer “what the fuck is juice,” why don’t we just start banning all drinks that aren’t coffee, tea, and water? Oh wait, we banned bottled water (because you know, poor people can’t like sparkling). Because poor people have always been poor, and have never known otherwise, and they’ve never had nice things, like water that bubbles. And poor people don’t need to exercise choices over what food they eat and what food they prefer because poor people aren’t allowed to have preferences. We aren’t allowed to access nice things."

-

If You Haven’t Been On Food Stamps, Stop Trying to Influence Government Policy | Racialicious

I am quoting a tiny, tiny portion of a piece that says everything I’ve been trying to write about ever since I started this blog: food politics, poverty, how and what people eat (and how we have no business policing it), etc. etc.

Only that, since this is written by Latoya Peterson, it is better articulated than I ever could.

(via redlightpolitics)

This piece is incredible.

(via morequasar)

yesssssss.

please read this.

(via morequasar)

"The idea of trusting the government to imprison people for life based on secret, untested evidence never reviewed by a court should repel any decent or minimally rational person, but these newly released files demonstrate how warped is this indefinite detention policy specifically."

- Glenn Greenwald (via azspot)

(via azspot)

"The use of solar energy has not been opened up because the oil industry does not own the sun."

- Ralph Nader, quoted in Linda Botts, ed., Loose Talk, 1980 (via mohandasgandhi)

(via brownboyman)

azspot:

Steve Sack

"A 70% cut to clean energy. A 25% cut in education. A 30% cut in transportation. Cuts in college Pell Grants that will grow to more than $1,000 per year. That’s what they’re proposing. These aren’t the kind of cuts you make when you’re trying to get rid of some waste or find extra savings in the budget. These aren’t the kind of cuts that Republicans and Democrats on the Fiscal Commission proposed. These are the kind of cuts that tell us we can’t afford the America we believe in.

And they paint a vision of our future that’s deeply pessimistic. It’s a vision that says if our roads crumble and our bridges collapse, we can’t afford to fix them. If there are bright young Americans who have the drive and the will but not the money to go to college, we can’t afford to send them. Go to China and you’ll see businesses opening research labs and solar facilities. South Korean children are outpacing our kids in math and science. Brazil is investing billions in new infrastructure and can run half their cars not on high-priced gasoline, but biofuels. And yet, we are presented with a vision that says the United States of America – the greatest nation on Earth – can’t afford any of this. It’s a vision that says America can’t afford to keep the promise we’ve made to care for our seniors. It says that ten years from now, if you’re a 65 year old who’s eligible for Medicare, you should have to pay nearly $6,400 more than you would today. It says instead of guaranteed health care, you will get a voucher. And if that voucher isn’t worth enough to buy insurance, tough luck – you’re on your own. Put simply, it ends Medicare as we know it. This is a vision that says up to 50 million Americans have to lose their health insurance in order for us to reduce the deficit. And who are those 50 million Americans? Many are someone’s grandparents who wouldn’t be able afford nursing home care without Medicaid. Many are poor children. Some are middle-class families who have children with autism or Down’s syndrome. Some are kids with disabilities so severe that they require 24-hour care. These are the Americans we’d be telling to fend for themselves.

Worst of all, this is a vision that says even though America can’t afford to invest in education or clean energy; even though we can’t afford to care for seniors and poor children, we can somehow afford more than $1 trillion in new tax breaks for the wealthy. Think about it. In the last decade, the average income of the bottom 90% of all working Americans actually declined. The top 1% saw their income rise by an average of more than a quarter of a million dollars each. And that’s who needs to pay less taxes? They want to give people like me a two hundred thousand dollar tax cut that’s paid for by asking thirty three seniors to each pay six thousand dollars more in health costs? That’s not right, and it’s not going to happen as long as I’m President."

-

President Obama, (via kateoplis)

Fucking finally.  (Video downloadable(!) and mp3)

^^^ really. I love what you said Obama, but this was wayyyy past due.

(via rebeccam)

"CNN poll: 65% of Americans want Congress to keep funding Planned Parenthood,; 71% favor continued EPA funding."

-

@HotlineSteve (via brooklynmutt)

In other words, the GOP is completely out of touch with most Americans.

(via soupsoup)

(via soupsoup)

"Remember when Planned Parenthood & NPR crashed the market, wiped out half our 401Ks and took TARP money? Me neither."

- Twitter / @Joel Housman (via azspot)

(via azspot)

I’ve been asked, “What is going on with this impending gov’t. shutdown”?

stfuconservatives:

stfusexists:

What it’s about, what will happen afterwards, etc., etc., which I am happy to answer!

What’s it about in a nutshell:

  • As I’m sure you know, Congress is required each fiscal year to approve a budget. The Democrats failed to do so last fiscal year, so it has been shunted along until now with temporary measures, the last of which expires tonight at midnight.
  • According to Democrat representatives, an agreement on the numbers has been reached between the two parties. However, the House Republicans are refusing to change the riders on the budget bill, so the Democrat dominated Senate will not pass the budget.
  • Riders, for anyone who doesn’t know, are provisions attached to bills that will be met once the bill is passed. It’s a way of pushing through social legislation without actually having to vote specifically on that social legislation.
  • It appears that the Republicans will not relent and present a budget that does not deny all federal funding to Planned Parenthood. “But Miss O,” you may ask me, “how do youknow that this isn’t about the numbers?”. To which I answer, PP receives $360 million per year from the federal government, which would add a mere .01% in cuts to the budget. Are we really going to be naive enough to pretend that the Republicans are more concerned about that .01% than they are about controlling women?

What will happen if the government shuts down?

  • Non-essential government employees will be laid off (or “furloughed”) until the government reopens. No paychecks, no work, nothing. Keep in mind, this does not include Congresspersons and any staff member they decide are “essential” (the people who HAVEN’T done their job), but does include…
  • Military personnel: People employed by the military will continue to work, and will be paid through today. But they will not be paid their earned wages again until the government shutdown ends. (Meaning that the government will have to pay back these wages, with interest, costing us more.)
  • The IRS: The IRS will have limited functioning. It will not change the April 18th tax deadline, but will not process any paper returns.
  • Passport processing, the Small Business Administration, the Federal Housing Administration, and the National Park Service will be shut down entirely.
  • The EPA, State Dept., Dept. of Veteran Affairs, Dept. of Homeland Security, and many more will operate at a very limited capacity
  • Projects contracted out by the federal government to private industry (such as defense contracting, which both of my parents work in) will be in jeopardy, resulting in a possible loss of private sector jobs

So there you have it. And again…is this worth $360 million?

In case anyone wants to catch up on the basics.